Why did Major County Sheriffs of America change its position on the CLARITY Act?

Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) changed its position to neutral after further reviewing the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) and discussing Section 604 with the US Administration. The organisation said it is no longer opposing the bill but continues to seek targeted amendments.

What are Major County Sheriffs of America's proposed changes to the CLARITY Act?

Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) wants the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) to include state and local law enforcement in Treasury studies, advisory groups and interagency bodies. The organisation said local agencies should help shape digital asset enforcement policy because they investigate many crypto-related crimes.

How does Major County Sheriffs of America view law enforcement's role under the CLARITY Act?

Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) said state and local agencies should play a central role in implementing any federal digital asset framework. It argued these agencies regularly investigate offences involving fraud, ransomware, narcotics trafficking, child exploitation and terrorism financing.

What resources does Major County Sheriffs of America say are needed under the CLARITY Act?

Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) said Congress should provide funding for training, technology, forensic capabilities and investigative resources. The organisation said these resources are needed to help state and local agencies respond to increasingly sophisticated digital asset-related crime.

What does Major County Sheriffs of America's neutral position on the CLARITY Act mean?

Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) said its neutral position means it neither supports nor opposes the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633). The organisation said it will continue working with Congress and the Administration to improve the legislation while supporting responsible digital asset regulation.

Image for illustrative purposes only. Not a real photo.

Sheriffs group adopts neutral stance on CLARITY Act

Written by Brie CarterPublished Jul 6, 2026, 12:14 AM

Major County Sheriffs of America shifted to a neutral position on the CLARITY Act after further discussions with the US Administration.
The organisation continues to seek amendments that would give state and local law enforcement a larger role in digital asset oversight.
The group said any federal crypto framework should include funding for training, forensic tools and investigative resources.

Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA), representing 113 sheriff's offices serving more than 130 million people, has adopted a neutral position on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) following further discussions with the US Administration.

The organisation said its revised position followed additional review of Section 604 and conversations about how the legislation would be interpreted and implemented, replacing concerns it raised in a letter sent on 14 May.

"MCSA is now neutral on H.R. 3633," the organisation said in a 3 July letter to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren.

MCSA said it is not endorsing the legislation and continues to seek amendments requiring state and local law enforcement to participate in Treasury studies, advisory groups and interagency bodies established under the bill.

The organisation said a federal digital asset regulatory framework should be supported by funding for training, technology, forensic capabilities and investigative resources, and MCSA is not a listed entity so no share price was available following the announcement.

MCSA argued that local law enforcement agencies investigate most digital asset-related crimes, including fraud, ransomware, narcotics trafficking, child exploitation, organised retail theft and terrorism financing, making their involvement important in future policy development.

The organisation said it will continue working with Congress, the Administration and other stakeholders to refine the CLARITY Act while supporting responsible innovation and strengthening law enforcement's ability to investigate digital asset-related crime.