Skip to main content
CFTC sues Utah over prediction market jurisdiction
Image for illustrative purposes only. Not a real photo.

CFTC sues Utah over prediction market jurisdiction

Share

Key points

  • The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission has sued Utah over state enforcement against federally regulated prediction markets.
  • The lawsuit challenges Utah’s attempt to apply state restrictions to markets operating under federal oversight.
  • The case could shape how prediction market operators navigate conflicts between federal regulation and state gambling laws.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sued Utah to block state enforcement actions against federally registered prediction market exchanges.

Utah had filed civil enforcement actions against CFTC-regulated markets and other businesses, prompting the federal regulator to challenge the state’s authority.

“Utah seeks to shut down prediction markets across a wide variety of markets,” CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said in a statement.

The CFTC argues that Utah’s restrictions conflict with federal authority over registered exchanges offering derivatives and event contracts.

“Congress entrusted the CFTC to be the federal regulator with sole responsibility to oversee these markets,” Selig said.

The CFTC is also pursuing legal proceedings against nine other states and has filed briefs in four federal appeals courts and one state supreme court.

The dispute centres on whether states can use local laws to restrict prediction markets operating under federal derivatives regulation, a question with implications for event-based trading platforms.

The lawsuit sets up another legal test of federal authority over prediction markets and states’ power to enforce gambling laws.


Frequently asked questions