
Anthropic faces lawsuit over Claude usage limits
- Anthropic faces a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging its Claude Max subscription plans provide less usage than advertised.
- The complaint claims subscribers paying US$100 and US$200 per month encounter restrictive usage caps that disrupt development work.
- The case adds to recent scrutiny of Anthropic as the company navigates regulatory and consumer-related challenges.
Anthropic has been sued in a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging that its Claude Max subscription plans provide significantly less usage than customers were led to expect.
The complaint was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California by Washington, DC resident Karl Kahn, who seeks to represent subscribers who purchased Claude Max plans since April 2024.
The lawsuit alleges that Anthropic marketed its Max plans as providing five times and 20 times the usage of its Pro subscription while delivering lower levels of access in practice.
Kahn claims he upgraded to the US$200-per-month Max 20x plan for software development work and that a single five-hour session consumed about 15% of his weekly usage allowance.
The lawsuit seeks a court ruling that Anthropic's marketing practices were misleading and requests relief for affected subscribers; following the filing there was no immediate public response from Anthropic.
The complaint references subscriber communications sent in July 2025 that allegedly outlined usage allowances across Claude models and subscription tiers, which the plaintiff argues differed from customer expectations.
The legal challenge follows recent scrutiny of Anthropic's decision to restrict access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models under US export control requirements while continuing to offer access to other Claude models.