Why is ASIC seeking a $10.3 million penalty against Mercer Super?

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is pursuing the fine over alleged systemic reporting failures. The regulator claims Mercer failed to report seven internal investigations as legally required and delayed notifying them of an eighth issue for a full year.

Who is Mercer Super and why does this regulatory action matter to the market?

Mercer Super is one of Australia's largest superannuation (pension) funds, managing approximately $80 billion in Assets Under Management (AUM). For retail investors and traders tracking the financial services sector, this case highlights intensifying regulatory scrutiny on compliance and governance.

Did Mercer Super members lose money because of these reporting breaches?

According to ASIC's submissions to the Federal Court, the reporting failures did not result in direct financial losses to Mercer Super members. Similarly, the breaches did not generate a direct financial benefit or windfall for Mercer itself.

What specific operational issues did Mercer Super fail to report?

The hidden internal investigations covered severe administrative errors within the fund. Specifically, Mercer failed to properly refund insurance premiums that had been incorrectly charged to deceased customers' accounts.

Why is the Federal Court questioning the $10.3 million fine agreed between ASIC and Mercer?

Justice Catherine Button pushed back on the agreed $10.3 million penalty, demanding deeper justification from ASIC. The judge expressed skepticism regarding the regulator's stance on how the hidden reports directly harmed everyday members, stating she would "rather not have to read into the tea leaves."

Image for illustrative purposes only. Not a real photo.

ASIC pushes for $10.3M Mercer Super fine

Written by Liezl GambePublished Jun 3, 2026, 4:45 AM

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has asked the Federal Court to impose a $10.3 million penalty on Mercer Super, one of the nation's largest superannuation funds managing approximately $80 billion.

The corporate watchdog initiated legal proceedings against Mercer last August, alleging systemic reporting failures.

According to ASIC, the fund failed to report up to seven internal investigations as required by law and delayed notifying the regulator about an eighth issue for a full year after it was first identified.

The internal reviews focused on critical operational issues, including Mercer's failure to properly refund insurance premiums charged to deceased members and delays in processing significant changes to customer account information.

During a Federal Court hearing, ASIC lawyers revealed they had reached an agreement with Mercer that a $10.3 million fine was appropriate.

However, the proposed penalty faced scrutiny from Justice Catherine Button, who pressed the regulator for deeper justification regarding how the reporting failures directly impacted members.

In response, ASIC argued that rigorous reporting obligations are "inextricably linked" to proper customer service.

The regulator's legal team emphasised that hundreds of thousands of members who entrusted their retirement savings to Mercer were denied the protection of a transparent, well-monitored system.

While ASIC acknowledged that the breaches did not cause direct financial losses to members or result in a financial windfall for Mercer, it maintained that a severe penalty is warranted because the failures represent a serious breach of high-level compliance standards.

Justice Button has requested further written submissions before finalising her judgement.