Sullivan & Cromwell apologises over AI legal errors

Grafa
Sullivan & Cromwell apologises over AI legal errors
Sullivan & Cromwell apologises over AI legal errors
Jon Cuthbert
Written by Jon Cuthbert
Share

Sullivan & Cromwell has apologised to a federal judge after submitting a legal filing containing about 40 incorrect citations and errors linked to AI hallucinations.

The firm said the mistakes appeared in an emergency motion filed in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, raising concerns about oversight in high-stakes legal work.

“We deeply regret that this has occurred,”

Said Andrew Dietderich, co-head of the firm’s global restructuring team, in a letter to Chief Judge Martin Glenn.

Dietderich added that while the firm has policies requiring verification of AI-generated content, those procedures were not followed in this instance, allowing errors to pass through review.

The case adds to a growing number of AI-related legal missteps, with legal technologist Damien Charlotin tracking more than 1,300 incidents globally, most involving fabricated citations.

Sullivan & Cromwell, which previously represented FTX in its bankruptcy, said it has launched an internal investigation and implemented immediate remedial measures.

The firm is now reviewing whether to strengthen training and verification processes after a rival law firm identified the errors and alerted the court.

Frequently asked questions

Connect with us

Grafa is not a financial advisor. You should seek independent, legal, financial, taxation or other advice that relate to your unique circumstances.

Grafa is not liable for any loss caused, whether due to negligence or otherwise arising from the use of or reliance on the information provided directly or indirectly, by use of this platform.