
South Korea sends two crypto cases to prosecutors
- South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) has referred suspects in two separate cryptocurrency market manipulation cases to prosecutors following its 12th regular meeting.
- The cases involve two individuals accused of using different methods to artificially distort crypto prices, attract retail buyers, and profit from manufactured market activity.
- The referrals reflect South Korea's continued tightening of oversight over virtual asset markets, where heavy retail participation has made price manipulation a regulatory priority.
In the first case, a crypto whale allegedly used tens of billions of Korean won — equivalent to approximately US$6.4 million per 10 billion won — over roughly two months to manipulate the price of a token listed on both domestic and overseas exchanges.
The suspect allegedly accumulated nearly half of the token's circulating supply, artificially pushed the price higher on overseas exchanges to create the appearance of global demand, and then sold holdings on a local exchange.
Retail investors reportedly suffered significant losses once the suspect exited into the demand they had helped manufacture.
In the second case, another individual allegedly used API channels to repeatedly place small buy and sell orders, creating a false impression of active trading, while simultaneously submitting high-priced limit buy orders to push the price higher.
The suspect then allegedly sold holdings in stages to realise profits while avoiding an immediate price collapse.
"Investors should refrain from chasing virtual assets whose prices and trading volumes surge without any reasonable cause,"
the FSC said.
"In particular, the so-called 'pump-and-dump' schemes artificially reduce available supply to inflate prices, and the subsequent sell-off often leads to a sharp price collapse,"
the FSC added.
The FSC announced plans to improve its warning system for highly concentrated crypto trading and strengthen its investigative framework to detect unfair practices more quickly.
The cases highlight the risks posed by thinly traded tokens where a single large holder can restrict supply, influence price discovery, and exit before smaller investors understand the source of the move.