Why did the CFTC sue New Mexico over prediction markets?

The CFTC sued New Mexico after the state accused Kalshi of offering unlicensed sports betting products. The regulator argues that Kalshi's event contracts are federally regulated financial products and therefore fall under its exclusive jurisdiction.

What is Kalshi and why is it at the centre of this dispute?

Kalshi is a federally regulated prediction market platform that allows users to trade contracts based on the outcome of future events. The legal dispute centres on whether sports event contracts should be treated as financial derivatives or as sports betting products.

Why does New Mexico believe Kalshi is offering illegal sports betting?

New Mexico alleges that Kalshi's sports event contracts function similarly to traditional sports wagers and are being offered without a state gambling licence. The state also claims the platform allowed users aged 18 to 20 to participate despite New Mexico's minimum gambling age of 21.

What is the CFTC's argument in the case?

The CFTC argues that Kalshi operates as a Designated Contract Market under federal commodities law and that its event contracts qualify as swaps. According to the regulator, states cannot apply gambling laws to products that are federally regulated as derivatives.

Why is this case important for prediction markets?

The outcome could determine whether prediction markets are primarily regulated at the federal level or remain subject to state gambling laws. The decision may affect how platforms structure and offer event-based contracts across the United States.

How many states has the CFTC sued over prediction markets?

New Mexico is the eighth state sued by the CFTC in similar disputes. Other states facing legal action include Rhode Island, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New York, Arizona, Connecticut and Illinois.

Image for illustrative purposes only. Not a real photo.

CFTC escalates prediction market clash with states

Written by Liezl GambePublished Jun 15, 2026, 5:10 AM

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has sued New Mexico officials in a growing legal battle over whether federally regulated prediction markets can offer sports event contracts without complying with state gambling laws.

The lawsuit follows a June 4 action by New Mexico, which accused prediction market platform Kalshi of operating unlicensed sports betting services and allowing users aged 18 to 20 to access its markets despite the state's minimum gambling age of 21.

The CFTC filed suit against New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, Attorney General Raúl Torrez and members of the New Mexico Gaming Control Board, arguing that Kalshi's event contracts fall under federal commodities law and are subject to the regulator's exclusive jurisdiction.

“New Mexico’s attempt to prevent a CFTC-regulated DCM from offering CFTC-approved financial products intrudes on the exclusive federal scheme Congress designed to oversee United States commodity derivatives markets,”

The regulator said in its complaint.

New Mexico is the eighth state sued by the CFTC over enforcement actions against prediction market operators, joining Rhode Island, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New York, Arizona, Connecticut and Illinois.

CFTC Chairman Mike Selig said states are attempting to impose gaming laws on federally regulated derivatives exchanges, arguing that oversight of such products belongs solely to the federal regulator.

The dispute intensified after former SEC and CFTC chairman Gary Gensler filed a legal brief questioning whether sports event contracts qualify as swaps under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act.